Who do you write like?

From the ever rewarding Word magazine’s “Something for the Weekend” newsletter came the link to the site www.iwl.me which apparently tells you who you write like.

First,  tried it with some random blog postings and it said that I wrote like David Foster Wallace of whom I had never heard, it seems that he had a very short and ultimately tragic life, he committed suicide at the age of 46.

Next – I used one of the first pieces that I wrote which was first published in 2007. Now apparently I am in the style of Cory Doctorow who isn’t a new name to me.

Finally, an editorial/opinion piece from 2009. This time I’m in the style of George Orwell – all those days reading “1984”, “Down & Out in Paris & London”, “Keep the Aspidistra Flying” et al, on the bus between Boston Spa and Harrogate must have had some influence. Coincidentally Orwell also died at 46.

Not very scientific but a bit of fun, give it a go.

The Monday Morning Quote

These will be posted on the last day of my vacation in Ireland. The “normal” service of good intentions will be resumed on Tuesday 27th July.

Today’s quotes are from the late Thomas Leonard who can be said to be the godfather of modern coaching.

There’s more information about Thomas here, here & here. You can subscribe to Thomas’s work here.

  • “People spend more time worrying about what might happen than dealing with things that do happen.”
  • “Focusing on the problem reinforces it. Focus on the results; problems will take care of themselves.”
  • “The trappings of lifestyle are often that; traps.”
  • “Tolerate nothing. When you put up with something, it costs you. Costs are expensive and thus unattractive.”
  • “Great coaching is not really about coaching skills, competencies or even proficiencies. It’s about being a great person. Great people make great coaches.”
  • “We’re all gonna pass on; most of us can have 50 to 70 great years as an adult. Tell me again why we should feel burdened with problems, shoulds, coulds, musts, tolerations, conflicts, pain, frustration, obligations, and duties?”

The Monday Morning Quote(s)

A few from the US 19th century.

Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind.

Absolve you to yourself, and you shall have the suffrage of the world.

Ralph Waldo Emerson

If you would convince a man that he does wrong, do right.

Men will believe what they see.

Henry David Thoreau

Let everything you do be done as if it makes a difference.

William James

The Monday Morning Quote

A bumper collection from Nisa Chitakasem’s blog on BNET

1)  “You are what you do. If you do boring, stupid, monotonous work, chances are you’ll end up boring, stupid, and monotonous” US lawyer Bob Black is being blunt, but he has a point.

2) “Right now, this is a job. If I advance any higher, this would be my career. And if this were my career, I’d have to throw myself in front of a train.” Jim Halpert of ‘The Office: An American Workplace’ epitomises someone whose job is not what they envisioned their career to be. But job satisfaction is just as important as career satisfaction. If your work makes you want to throw yourself in front of a train, then it’s time to make changes — to aspects of your role, or your role altogether.

3) “If you have to support yourself, you had bloody well better find some way that it going to be interesting.” Actress Katherine Hepburn had bills to pay too, but she really did find an interesting way to pay them. Yes, you need it, but don’t just work for the money. Instead, find something you truly love doing and then find a way of getting paid for doing it.

4) “Every day I get up and look through the Forbes list of the richest people in America. If I’m not there, I go to work.” Magician and writer Robert Orben may be driven by riches, but the message is to find something that motivates you to not only work, but to be the best you can be. There’s nothing wrong with healthy competition and ambition — they can turn average organisations into excellent ones.

5) “Work and Play are words used to describe the same thing under different circumstance.” Mark Twain is right. You can do something that you love as a hobby, after work. Or you can do something you love for work, during the daytime when you’re more alert, and get paid for it.

6) “A career is wonderful, but you can’t curl up with it on a cold night.” Marilyn Monroe would no doubt be turning in her grave at Lady GaGa’s counter-quote that “your career will never wake up and tell you that it doesn’t love you anymore”. That may be true, Gaga, but if you treat your career like it’s the only member of your family, it’s more likely that your life partner will eventually fall out of love with you. Of course a career is a huge part of your life, but so is a family. They can’t make the decisions for you, but at least consider them when making major career choices. Sorry Gaga, Marilyn’s career advice wins out here.

7) “The closest to perfection a person ever comes is when he fills out a job application form.” Businessman Stanley J Randall must have come across a few lying job candidates in his time. How did he know they were lying? Because if you lie on your job application or CV, or at interview, you will get found out, especially if you make yourself sound perfect. It’s like cheating in an exam and answering all the questions right — that 100 percent just looks suspicious.

8) “If you don’t like your job you don’t strike. You just go in every day and do it really half-assed.” Homer Simpson is half right. Don’t go on strike if you’re unhappy with your job role. Talk with your employer about how it can be changed to suit you more. If that won’t cut it, consider changing  jobs. And do I really need to tell you why Homer is half-wrong? If you do your job half-heartedly because you think it’s the fastest route to change, you’re wholly wrong. Your employer will not empathise. They’ll be reluctant to alter your role and they won’t give you a great reference if you want to change careers.

9) “I’m doing everything I can to sabotage my career. It’s a little thing called ‘fear of success’.” It’s human nature to subconsciously to mess up something good in our lives, as media personality Jon Stewart observes. It’s the ‘do the dumping before you get dumped’ syndrome. Overcome these insecurities by remembering all the effort you’ve put into getting a job you love and using that to remind yourself that you’ve earned this opportunity — you deserve it. If you continue to show the same dedication and effort that you’ve so far invested in pursuing your chosen career, there’s no logical reason why it should ‘dump’ you, so stop thinking it will.

10) “I don’t wish my career on anyone.” Musician John Entwistle’s quote can be taken two ways. First, that you hate your career so much you wouldn’t wish it on anyone. Or that while you love your career, no-one else would want it. It’s important to remember that our personal preferences apply to our careers as well as to everything else in our lives. If you’re looking for a job or choosing a career, don’t go for something just because it’s what you think your peers would be interested in. You are unique as a human being, your career objectives are unique and so should your career choice. Decide on what you want to do and then find a way of doing it.

You may be wondering why I just didn’t come out and say what I had to say instead of using stupid quotes. Well, I’ll leave you with one last quote from David H Comins: “People will accept your idea much more readily if you tell them Benjamin Franklin said it first.”

The Monday Morning Quote

“Success is a great killer of innovation”

“Schumpeter” in The Economist

Planning for the sequel
How Pixar’s leaders want to make their creative powerhouse outlast them

“TO INFINITY and beyond!” Buzz Lightyear’s memorable if nonsensical phrase has been echoing around playgrounds ever since Pixar introduced the space ranger to the world in “Toy Story” in 1995. It will echo with renewed vigour this week when Pixar releases the third instalment. There is every reason to expect that three will be as successful as one and two—and Pixar will continue to mint money for its parent company, Walt Disney.

Pixar has succeeded as well as anyone in mastering the art of creativity. The company has produced one animated hit after another—including “Finding Nemo”, “Cars” and, a particular favourite of this columnist for its enthusiasm for unbridled individualism, “The Incredibles”. Rather than being crushed by Disney, as many feared, Pixar has reinvigorated its parent company.

But hit machines can run out of steam. Pixar’s founding fathers cannot go on for ever. Ed Catmull, the firm’s president, is 65, and John Lasseter, its chief creative officer, is 53, which makes him ancient by Hollywood standards. Creativity is hard enough to sustain for individuals, let alone organisations. Business history is littered with the corpses of corporate Icaruses that rose heavenwards on the wings of creativity only to plunge to the ground. That is a worry not just for Pixar but for the whole Disney empire: Mr Catmull doubles as head of Disney Animation Studios and Mr Lasseter is chief creative officer for both businesses.

How likely is it that Pixar will be able to escape that fate? The company has one important thing on its side: planning. Messrs Catmull and Lassetter spent many of their formative years watching Icaruses fall to earth from their base near Silicon Valley. Even Apple almost expired before begging Steve Jobs to return to the company. The pair consequently did everything that they could to build a machine that could outlast them—and continue churning out animated characters for decades to come.

Pixar’s approach to creativity is striking for two reasons. The first is that the company puts people before projects. Most Hollywood studios start by hunting down promising ideas and then hire creative teams to turn them into films. The projects dictate whom they hire. Pixar starts by bringing in creative people and then encourages them to generate ideas. One of its most successful recruits has been Brad Bird, who has presided over two Oscar-winning feature films, “The Incredibles” (in which he also provided a character’s voice) and “Ratatouille”.

The second is that the company devotes a lot of effort to getting people to work together. In most companies, people collaborate on specific projects, but pay little attention to what’s going on elsewhere in the business. Pixar, however, tries to foster a sense of collective responsibility among its 1,200 staff. Employees show unfinished work to one another in daily meetings, so get used to giving and receiving constructive criticism. And a small “brain trust” of top executives reviews films in the works.

Pixar got the inspiration for this system from a surprising place—Toyota and its method of “lean production”. For decades Toyota has solicited constant feedback from workers on its production lines to prevent flaws. Pixar wants to do the same with producing cartoon characters. This system of constant feedback is designed to bring problems to the surface before they mutate into crises, and to provide creative teams with a source of inspiration. Directors are not obliged to act on the feedback they receive from others, but when they do the results can be impressive. Peer review certainly lifted “Up”, a magical Pixar movie that became the studio’s highest-grossing picture at the box office after “Finding Nemo”. It helped produce the quirky storyline of an old man and a boy who fly to South America in a house supported by a bunch of balloons.

Pixar also obliges its teams to conduct formal post mortems once their films are complete. In lesser hands this might degenerate into a predictable Hollywood frenzy of backslapping and air-kissing. But Pixar demands that each review identify at least five things that did not go well in the film, as well as five that did.

And the winner is…

None of this can guarantee Pixar’s long-term success. Creative organisations depend to a striking extent on the X-factor provided by charismatic leaders such as Messrs Catmull and Lasseter. Creativity depends on serendipity as much as planning: Pixar itself started life making computer parts and only dabbled in animation as a sideline. Success is a great killer of innovation: there is an ever greater danger that, as Pixar’s list of blockbusters lengthens, its “creatives” will take ever fewer risks and its managers will become ever more complacent (as happened, by the way, at Toyota). Too much planning can alienate the prickly eccentrics who sometimes drive the creative process. It is worth remembering that Disney went into a long decline because its emphasis on doing things the Disney way alienated many creative people. But on the other hand not even the most robust production systems can eliminate risk: the second “Toy Story” film had to go through a set of wrenching revisions at high speed after it went too far off the rails, in spite of the studio’s early-warning systems.

Managing creativity involves a series of difficult balancing acts: giving people the freedom to come up with new ideas but making sure that they operate within an overall structure, creating a powerful corporate culture but making sure that it is not too stifling. Few organisations can get this balancing act right in the long term—particularly as the formula can change over time.

But Pixar’s attempt to solve this problem is nevertheless impressive. The company’s enthusiasm for thinking ahead is admirable. Even more admirable is its willingness to look to a car company for inspiration. For a culture as inward-looking as Hollywood’s, that is a remarkable piece of creative thinking.

(This article was corrected online on June 19th: we had referred to “Saving Nemo” when we had of course meant “Finding Nemo”.)

World Cup – Last Comment

I didn’t hear this but my brother assures me that a German journalist said of the English team following their defeat by Germany.

“Their problem is that they think they play like Beckham looks, the reality is that they play like Rooney looks.”

The Monday Morning Quote

“Your future is created by what you do today, not tomorrow.”

Robert Kiyosaki

Richard Emms wows LDC conference

I have never met Richard Emms but I would like to shake his hand after reading his speech to the LDC Conference, UK Dentistry needs more people like Richard. I have no idea if I am “out of order” by publishing this here but as long as Richard has no complaint then I can’t say I really care. If you are involved in Dentistry in any way at all do take a few minutes to read & digest.

LDC Conference chairman, Richard Emms received a standing ovation after his speech to the pre-Conference dinner. He called for consistency from Primary Care Trusts and honesty from the Department of Health. He called on the chief dental officer for England, Barry Cockcroft to trust the profession. ‘If our patients trust us to do the right thing why can’t the department, I think we’ve earned it’, he said.

“Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. It is a great honour to stand before you this evening and to welcome you to this, the pre-conference dinner of the 59th Annual Conference of Local Dental Committees.

There is a mixture of emotions as I stand here, firstly pride… I’m proud to be on my home patch, very proud of the fact that you have elected me chair of this important body, and proud to be the third member of North Yorkshire Local Dental Committee to address you in this role, and I’d like to crave your indulgence to take this opportunity to thank two of my predecessors as conference chairs Stuart Robson and John Renshaw for the support and encouragement they have given me over the years since I joined the LDC as a fresh faced young pup almost twenty years ago.
As I look down and see John and Stuart’s name on this chain of office, it’s quite a humbling experience to read the other illustrious names of those that have gone before and to consider the contribution they have made to the profession, and the leadership that they have given.
The overwhelming emotion this evening however, is one of nervousness as one realises the fact that the audience at conference is traditionally, shall we say opinionated, and not one that will readily stand any bullshitting!
In recent years this seems to have been coupled with a predeliction for the ancient sport of chairbaiting, a situation that leads me to the feeling so quaintly described by Sir Alex Ferguson as teams approach the business end of the football season as, “squeaky bum time”.
And yet, and yet, I do feel a little more secure in having home advantage, as it were, and safe in the knowledge that I have played this venue previously, though it was a slightly different gig.
I appeared on the stage behind me here a few years ago in the Ripon Amateur Operatic Society’s 2002 production of Sound of Music so if things do go all a bit pear shaped this evening and I experience a Robert Green moment, I can always fall back on an impromptu Karaoke evening of such sing- along favourites as “How do you solve a problem like a Warburton contract” and that classic made popular by the PCTs “16 going on 17 pounds a UDA”
When you look around this magnificent auditorium you wouldn’t guess that when I was treading the boards up there as the Nazi butler of Captain Von Trapp, the building was close to being condemned, (unlike the performance I hasten to add). After 100 years the place was facing wrack and ruin, it was no longer fit for purpose. The Grand Circle behind you was unsafe, the roof leaked, and the dressing rooms, which are below us, were a hard hat area. A situation that was OK for the men playing the German soldiers, but it was hell for the nuns! I think we were the last company to perform here before it was closed for repair and refurbishment. After much thought and planning and several millions of pounds of investment, it was reopened last year and I’m sure you’ll agree it’s pretty impressive.
Around the same time I was elected to serve on the newly constituted GDPC where we soon began discussing another edifice that many thought was coming to the end of its usefulness, namely the old NHS contract.
Aha I hear the more astute and perhaps more sober members of the audience murmuring, he’s using the successful rebuilding of this auditorium as a metaphor for the reconstruction of NHS dentistry.
Would that I could. For while we began to put the foundations down for the new system, the plans suddenly changed and we were left with a structure vastly different from the one that had been envisaged. I’m sure you will remember those early days, Darrin Robinson, who was then with the Dept, was giving roadshows likening the new PDS system to a football match where we could stand on the sidelines to watch the early enthusiasts playing the game until we felt it was so good that we too were ready to participate.
You can picture the scene, the sun was always shining, the skies were blue, the grass was green, jumpers for goalposts, marvellous. Sadly just as we were all getting ready to join in, the park-keeper came along and not only moved our jumpers but told us all that from now on we would be playing a very different game.
Suddenly everything changed.

What is it with change – we’ve just been through an election campaign where two of the parties’ slogans, not surprisingly perhaps, focussed on change. Its true that we are not happy with things the way things are and that something needs to be done, but why do we have to have so much change, so quickly and so all consuming. The only constant seems to be keep changing.
Confession time. I’m a bit of a traditionalist; I’m comfortable with the familiar and quite like the status quo. I like old fashioned musicals, test cricket and the fact they still sing Abide with Me at the cup final. There’s a line in that hymn which seems appropriate for dentists at this time and in the situation in which we find ourselves, ‘Change and decay in all around I see”
Was it always so, – did we ever face such changes in our working lives in such a short period of time. I suppose it’s inevitable that at these sorts of events one looks back before looking forward.
When I qualified in the early eighties the only acronyms required were MOD, ELA and RCT plus the occasional, not politically correct, tongue in cheek ones that suggested perhaps that a condition was “normal for norfolk”. Any jargon we used was purely clinical, Mandibular, maxillary, extraction, oro-antral fistula.
In the new NHS it’s so much more complicated. If you wish to open a practice you contact the PCT with an EOI. They will then give you a PQQ before an ITT where you can consider the KPIs and the QOF after which, if you are successful, you will need to register with the CQC. One needs to look at the dashboard and check the metrics, observe the traffic light system and allocate to Red Amber or Green.
If you want advice, it’s a toss up whether you call the BDA or the RAC. We seem to be talking a different language these days where just like Humpty Dumpty in Alice in Wonderland words can mean anything they choose them to mean.
How can all practices have an average value? By its very definition some must be better and some must be worse. I must have treated thousands of patients but I don’t think I’ve ever seen an average patient; I’ve certainly never seen one and only provided the average of 1.4 restorations. To criticise a practice for not having an average return is about as sensible as castigating a PCT for not having all their workers of average intelligence.
Ask any clinician about quality and you will get a range of answers but I guess some would include the margins on a crown, the longevity of a restoration, or the radiographic appearance of a completed root filling.
What you wouldn’t hear amongst the answers would be the number of new patients seen, the presence of a swanky NHS logo or the percentage re-attending within nine months.
And at what point did nine become a magic number. How can only one interval from NICE Recall Guidelines be taken, Recall Guidelines remember, and then that be misinterpreted and the meaning changed and re-attendance pattern used as a measure of quality. I’m sorry, that’s not quality, that’s rationing.
And its not just recall intervals. We seem to have entered a world that wants to measure everything. We forget that very often the things that can be counted don’t count and the things that do count can’t be counted.
Real quality is any number of timeless classics, reassuring the patient, continuity of care, time spent in communication, a willingness to go the extra mile. Which box do I tick for that data set? We are facing a steady erosion of what we have traditionally recognised as professional responsibility, “doing the right thing when nobody is watching” as Susie Sanderson quoted at last years conference. An erosion of the discernment that our professional education and experience has brought us. Most practices that are not achieving their UDAs are not doing so because they are slacking but because they ARE being professional and, despite the system, are trying to do what’s best for their patients.
I qualified at the end of the paternalistic era, the era of doctor knows best and patients were expected to have done to them what the dentist felt was best for them. We moved through to the phase, quite rightly, of agreeing options with the patient and listening to their wishes.
It’s a great privilege to metaphorically take a patient by the hand (CRB and ISA checks permitting of course) and lead them through an agreed treatment plan, and it’s why patients stay with us because they trust us to inform them and to do the right thing.
But that’s going, its been replaced with a ‘PCT knows best’ mentality with their hard enforcement of clinical data sets without the knowledge of the circumstances of the patient sat in the chair in front of us. Where there is a greater concern with structures and process than care. We heard just a few days ago that there’s to be a public enquiry into last year’s tragic events in Mid-Staffordshire when the quest for target achievement became paramount and patient care suffered.
I think it’s Goodhart’s law that states that when a measure becomes a target it ceases to become a measure. So, in the target driven NHS, its starting to get somewhat soul destroying, and I’ve lost count of the number of colleagues who have said to me that they are glad that they are at the end of their careers and not at the beginning.
That’s a sad indictment on a system that, when it was being discussed back in 2004, was supposed to be good for patients, good for the department and good for dentists. It took a special skill to get it wrong on all counts. But what can we do –
We have a new coalition administration and I understand they want to focus on outcomes. Ok that’s fine, but it will require a deal of thought and work not only by GDPC but also by practitioners like those in this room, those who are at the tooth face, to come forward with suggestions so that appropriate outcomes can be determined and how they can best be evaluated.
And yes at the moment we have Steele with his recommendations on a new way of working, and it will be interesting to hear Jimmy again tomorrow, one year on, as to his take on the state of change, and I am sure that there will be strong opinions expressed from delegates on the direction of travel.
But is it enough, have we gone down the road we’d rather not journey, too far away from our practice independence toward micro management ever to return. Perhaps.

But its no good just moaning about it and throwing our hands up in despair. Some LDCs have not joined us this year as they feel that some of our meetings and conferences are pointless, we never change anything, and that it is just one big whinge fest. I’d like to hope that surely we could be more than that. Yes, things are now more locally and regionally focussed, and we are building a strong network of regional LDC groupings, but it is still centrally where the big decisions are made and it is only through national gatherings such as this that we can hope to influence policy.
In the film Network, Peter Finch plays a grizzled cynical anchorman in a US news station who eventually has had enough. He goes on air and announces to his audience that “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore” a mantra that is taken up by the viewing public.
Perhaps that’s what we need to do. We need to stop our whinge fest and say we’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it anymore. We need to retake a hold on our professional lives and livelihoods and articulate our thoughts, and our concerns, to put forward our ideas for change because that surely is the function of this conference.
Where can we start. Flippantly, I could suggest at the very beginning. It may not be raindrops on roses or whiskers on kittens but perhaps I can share with you some of my favourite things!
How about some consistency from PCTs?
How can it be that using the same guidance, one PCT does one thing and another takes a contrary view? One willingly collecting LDC levies whilst another refuses. I’m all for local solutions, but for one PCT to say that practice transfers are not allowed whilst another encourages it is unfair, confusing for everyone and breeds uncertainty.
How about some honesty from the department? We might not like what you have to say but at least we would know where we stood.
· if you don’t like the idea of independent contractors – say so.
· if you want a service to be purely access driven – say so
· if you want limited treatments and a core service – say so
but please – don’t pretend to us or our patients that in the current climate you can provide all of the treatment, to all of the people, all of the time. That fools nobody.
And what about trust?When this place was a wreck and PDS was on the horizon, we were promised, don’t laugh, a high trust environment.The Chief Dental Officer believes we should have ‘earned autonomy’ in other words we should show that we can be trusted. Well I’m sorry Barry but we have been educated over many years to think, to diagnose and to treat on an individual basis. Yes we are mindful of the wider aspects of health care but our responsibility lies with the patient in front of us. Their needs and yes their demands are paramount.
If our patients trust us to do the right thing why can’t the department, I think we’ve earned it. So here we all are, gathered on the eve on conference. We come from the four corners of the country, from the North of Scotland, from Southern Cornwall, from East Anglia and from West Wales. We come to represent our constituents, their practices and their patients and it’s an opportunity to make known their feelings as to what is happening and to present our ideas for change, in a constructive fashion I hope, with knowledge and with passion. I hope we will have robust debate and by the close of conference have articulated not only the personal views of the delegates but of those we represent.
I started this evening with a theatrical allusion and I’d like to close with one. Towards the end of Howard Barker’s play Victory, which is set in the aftermath of the English Civil war and the restoration of the Monarchy, one of the characters has this line, he says; “You have nowhere to go to in the end but where you come from”
I hope that during the debates tomorrow you too will remember where you come from and what our purpose is. Enjoy the rest of the evening, I shall be able to now, and have a great conference. Thank You”

Kolbe Case Study – A long way away in a practice by the sea

This is a study of a practice set up that is by no means unique in my experience. Neil and Sharon are married dentists, and are partners and owners of this 5 year-old practice. They rely heavily on their practice manager Julie and have just appointed a new associate Debbie. What they wanted to know was how well this new set up would work, what would be the strengths and the potential weaknesses.

Their Kolbe scores:

Fact

Finder

Follow Through Quick

Start

Implementor
Neil (partner) 4 2 9 4
Sharon (partner) 7 3 7 3
Julie (PM) 7 7 2 4
Debbie (associate) 7 6 2 6

I had been working with Julie for six months or so before Debbie was appointed and already knew the main problems that existed in the management team of the two partners and practice manager.

Neil, who initiates in Quick Start, is an instinctive innovator who:

  • Challenges
  • Originates
  • Promotes
  • Brainstorms
  • Risks &
  • Intuits

Sharon scores equally in Fact Finder & Quick Start but in the Kolbe “Theory of Dominance”, Fact Finder will dominate the other mode.

Both Julie and Debbie initiate in Fact Finder also. This means that all three will:

  • Probe
  • Prioritise
  • Prove
  • Specify
  • Calculate
  • Define

That’s a certain amount of theory behind things but what happened in practice? Let’s not forget that Neil & Sharon are married and both can initiate in Quick Start, so one problem was predictable and happened as predicted. Julie would have management meetings with both of the partners where decisions would be made, Julie with her high Fact Find & Follow Through wants to plan, co-ordinate, seek order, establish procedures and work sequentially.

The partners would go home, talk things through, change decisions and act on their intuition. Result – one thoroughly irritated Practice Manager not because she disagreed with anything that her bosses had done, as she would say “It’s their business and ultimately their success, so they can do what they think is best”, but rather because, as she prevents in Quick Start, her instinct is to not be impulsive, ambiguous or to create chaos, neither will she want to operate in crisis mode whereas Neil & Sharon thrive on that.

One other problem was that Sharon, with her high fact find, a trait common in dentists, would frequently duplicate Julie’s efforts and draw conclusions leaving Julie feeling by-passed.

Sadly, although the partners had introduced Kolbe analysis into the practice I don’t believe they realised the evidence in front of them. Julie struggled with her role, not with getting the work of practice manager done but with any allowance for the way that she worked and how challenging she found working with the partners.

To go back to the addition of the associate. She initiates in Fact Finder, add that to the same scores from Sharon & Julie, could well result in there being a tendency for the clinical & management team to fall into “Perfection Paralysis”.

Here’s a quick look at the team synergy;

Fact Find Follow Through Quick Start Implement Team Synergy Ideal
0-3 Prevent 0 50% 50% 25% 31% 25%

+/- 5%

4-6 Respond 25% 25% 0 75% 31% 50%

+/- 10%

7-10 Initiate 75% 25% 50% 0% 38% 25%

+/- 5%

They score above 30% in the Initiate and Prevent Zones this can lead to Polarization which in an organisation is like conflict between individuals. Productivity is blocked because energy is sidetracked in internal tugs-of-war.

Their energy is turned inwards and this results in “on again, off again” efforts culminating in a self-destructive team.

The solutions?

  • Appoint people to “bridge” the gaps for selective projects – not necessarily easy for a small set up.
  • Break into project teams, this was tried on an informal basis but as soon as the partners got to talking across the dinner table the efforts were undermined.
  • Work independently towards shared goals, within a small organisation not that easy.
  • Look for an associate with a complimentary Kolbe MO

There was no simple answer to this one and most of my time was spent supporting the practice manager who, in spite of her efforts, felt repeatedly let down by her employers and was planning her long-term exit strategy.

Ironically although she was, at least on the face of it, regarded as a highly valued employee and a cornerstone of the practice, it was possible that she had come to the end of her time in terms of the use of her skills. Her instinctive initiation in Fact Find and Follow Through had been invaluable during a period of change and growth (coinciding ironically with Debbie’s maternity leave) but now in a time of building on those changes her skills MO wasn’t as applicable.

There also came into this, obviously, the practice owners whose emotional relationship overrode most other things although it was frequently to the detriment of the smooth running of the practices. So if you’re going into business with your spouse / partner or you’re already there your Kolbe score may explain a huge amount.

PS There was a coach’s dilemma, I was employed by the partners to coach the manager, to whom was my duty? In this and every case, to the individual who was being coached.

The Monday Morning Quote

“Never complain. Never explain.

Benjamin Disraeli

Exactly. (Thanks to Hugh Macleod)