I must own up to having mixed feeling about the practice of “facial aesthetics”. When I examine my motives I realise they have arisen from
- having a close family interest matters of the skin here & here
- concern that some young dentists were seeing it as a panacea for gaps in their appointment books.
- it was being used to avoid thorough examination and performance of comprehensive dentistry.
None of these are entirely logical, so I suppose it should be a “peripheral’ skill in that dentists should know about it. They should know where to refer their patients if they feel that they would benefit from treatment with botox or fillers. Or, if they are really keen they should do one of the courses that are available and ensure that they are proficient in the techniques.
But should they be practice builders? As a foundation of a practice I would be very concerned.
Now the GDC have spoken…”As a result of the Council’s Scope of Practice consultation in early 2008, the Council has agreed that non-surgical cosmetic procedures outside the immediate mouth area are not dentistry. The Council will also be undertaking an impact assessment on whether surgical procedures away from the face, such as bone harvesting from the hip, should not be considered dentistry.”
Fuller report here
Don’t have too many eggs in one basket as our grandmothers would have said.
Will this result in separate businesses under the same roof? See last weeks blog entry.
Like this:
Like Loading...